The assessment stage is official; the vendor is not
Official sourceThis distinction matters more than anything else on the page. Siemens plc's own apprenticeships PDF names an "Online behavioural based assessment" and adds that it "allows us to assess if you align with our core values and demonstrate the potential we're looking for". Siemens ANZ calls its version "game-based online assessments that use interactive scenarios to understand your traits, approaches and potential in an engaging, bias-free environment". Siemens Healthineers UK calls its version a "game-based assessment" of behavioral traits and cognitive ability. All three are official statements from Siemens-owned pages. None of them names a vendor. Every vendor claim you read about Siemens — ours included — is an inference from someone else's page.
Source: Siemens plc UK apprenticeships PDF (SCF V12, GB&I 2026)
Why we name Arctic Shores, and how far that goes
Multiple sourcesArctic Shores publishes two of its own Siemens case studies and a first-hand candidate account, Siemens appears twice on Arctic Shores's live case-studies index, and independent trade press covers the same Siemens Electrification & Automation GB&I project. That is vendor-official plus press evidence — genuinely multi-source, and far stronger than the usual prep-site guess. What it does not establish is currency. The diversity case study anchors only to "In 2018"; the CV-less project was hired around December 2022; the case-study pages themselves carry no dates; and no current Siemens page names the vendor. So: Arctic Shores is well evidenced historically at Siemens UK and is the reasonable inference for the current behavioral assessment. It is not confirmed for the 2026-27 cycle, and we will not pretend otherwise.
Source: Arctic Shores case studies index (Siemens listed twice)
What Arctic Shores published about Siemens, with dates attached
Multiple sourcesArctic Shores's early-careers case study describes a bespoke Fit Profile built from employee completion data plus interactive mobile-friendly tasks, and claims a 100 percent increase in female final-stage representation, a 65 percent increase in assessment centre pass rates, and 85 percent positive candidate feedback — all against a 2018 baseline, all Arctic Shores's own figures, none independently audited. Its CV-less case study reports 533 applications against 83 previously, a 91 percent assessment completion rate, an eight-person shortlist, a 50:50 gender split at final interview, roles filled in 41 days against 200-plus, and 242 hours of manual screening eliminated. These are vendor marketing figures for a specific project, not Siemens's published results, and not a description of what you will sit.
Source: Arctic Shores case study, Siemens CV-less hiring
The vendor and the trade press disagree on the numbers
Multiple sourcesWorth knowing, because it tells you how much weight these figures carry. For the same Siemens Electrification & Automation project, Arctic Shores says 533 applications against 83 and roles filled in 41 days against 200-plus. UNLEASH, reporting independently in September 2023 on hiring that had happened around nine months earlier, says 500-plus applications (a 500 percent increase), an eight-person shortlist scoring over 95 percent, an equal gender split, and time to hire down to nearly 60 days from 150. Those are not the same numbers. Neither source is obviously wrong; they are simply not interchangeable, and any page that presents one set as settled fact is hiding the discrepancy.
Source: UNLEASH, How CV-less recruiting more than halved Siemens' time to hire (8 September 2023)
No one publishes which tasks Siemens deploys
Official sourceNeither Arctic Shores case study names a single task. The candidate hired through the EA process described only "a series of different experiments". Arctic Shores configures its battery per employer, and has moved from branded games to unbranded task-based assessments. So there is no honest task list for Siemens — not from Siemens, not from Arctic Shores, not from any candidate account we could verify. Any page that hands you a confident list of "the Siemens games" has padded it from the generic Arctic Shores battery. What you can do is practice the format, which is what the section below offers.
Source: Arctic Shores Siemens case studies — no task named on either page
The video interview is conditional, and the platform is not named
Official sourceSiemens plc's wording is "You may be asked to complete an on-demand video interview where you'll record yourself answering some pre-defined questions." The "may" is Siemens's. It is a fixed dated stage in the ANZ graduate cycle, and it does not appear at all in the Siemens Healthineers UK apprenticeship process. As for who runs it: no Siemens page, no invitation and no candidate report we could actually fetch names a platform. The widely repeated claim that Siemens uses HireVue traces to prep sites and a vendor blog selling HireVue preparation, with no job posting, invitation or candidate account behind it. We will not repeat it.
Source: Siemens plc UK apprenticeships PDF (SCF V12, GB&I 2026)
Video interview mechanics Siemens does publish
Official sourceSiemens's careers FAQ is unusually concrete about the logistics even though it names no vendor. The stage has an expiring deadline rather than a booked slot. A reminder email is sent beforehand, including the recruiter's contact details. Extensions are not generally offered. And the practice interview is "solely to help you test your camera and microphone setup" — it "does not contain any interview questions", so do not treat it as a preview of what you will be asked.
Source: Siemens careers FAQ
Siemens says AI does not make the decision
Official sourceSiemens's careers FAQ states that its AI-powered platform "is designed to assist the hiring process, not to make automated decisions" and that "All final decisions related to hiring will always remain with the human recruiters and hiring managers involved". We scanned the full FAQ specifically for the widely repeated claim that the Siemens video interview analyzes your facial expressions, tone or body language: there is no such claim anywhere on Siemens's own page, and Siemens states the opposite in kind. Do not prepare for facial-expression scoring at Siemens on current evidence.
Source: Siemens careers FAQ
SHL and Aon: no usable evidence at Siemens
No evidence foundThe claim that Siemens uses SHL and Aon traces to a single prep site that cites no sources, no job postings and no links, attributing everything to its own research. We checked the one official-looking Aon case study on Siemens: the URL returns a redirect to Aon's generic insights hub with no Siemens content at all. Secondary material suggests any Aon-Siemens work concerned a careers-guidance tool rather than candidate selection. If you have been told to prepare SHL verbal and numerical tests for Siemens, nothing we could verify supports that.
Source: Targeted check of the SHL and Aon claims at Siemens, 11 September 2026
Siemens Energy and Siemens Healthineers are different companies
Official sourceBoth are separately listed, neither is part of Siemens AG, and both run funnels that differ from Siemens plc's. Siemens Energy: CV Screening, online assessment, on-demand video interview, panel interview with a case study, offer — the case study sits inside the final panel, and the online assessment is never described as game-based. Siemens Healthineers UK apprenticeships: CV screened, game-based assessment, on-site assessment centre with a strengths-based interview and group exercise — three stages, no video interview named. Conflating these with the Siemens plc process is the most common error in Siemens prep content.
Source: Siemens Energy Graduate Program; Siemens Healthineers UK apprenticeships