Permanent officials
EPSO competitions produce reserve lists for EU institutions. Graduate AD5 competitions require no previous professional experience; specialist competitions have different requirements.
Source: Permanent staff selection
EPSO competitions, CAST contract roles and Blue Book traineeships follow separate selection routes; no shared game battery is established.
By the Game Assessment Prep research teamUpdated September 17, 2026How we research
No reviewed source establishes one game-based assessment shared by all European Commission applicants. Identify the named test in your invitation before selecting practice.
A useful preparation plan begins with the exact opportunity. Copy its reference into your notes and separate mandatory requirements from desirable experience. This prevents time being spent on an assessment that belongs to another route.
This guide distinguishes official process information from suggested exercises. The exercises help you organize practice; they are not leaked questions, predictions of your interview or an official EPSO preparation product.
EPSO competitions produce reserve lists for EU institutions. Graduate AD5 competitions require no previous professional experience; specialist competitions have different requirements.
Source: Permanent staff selection
The Commission also recruits non-permanent staff. Recruiting services use CAST to find and shortlist contract-agent profiles matching their vacancies.
Source: Apply for temporary jobs
Initial assessment considers education, language skills and other experience. Supporting documents are checked before successful applicants enter the Virtual Blue Book.
Source: Blue Book process overview
The current AD5 guidance lists reasoning, EU knowledge, digital skills and the EUFTE written assessment. Reasoning includes verbal, numerical and abstract questions. Confirm the exact conditions in your competition notice.
Source: Graduates (Administrators – AD5)
EUFTE evaluates written communication using supplied material: logical organization, concision, clarity, audience awareness and effective use of information. It is not presented as a factual-knowledge or language test.
Source: Graduates (Administrators – AD5)
EPSO describes multiple-choice verbal, numerical and abstract reasoning tests for contract-staff selection. Its sample materials support familiarity with the format.
Source: EPSO testing
EPSO announced in June 2024 that all competitions under its former assessment-centre model had concluded. Older descriptions of that model should not be treated as a current universal procedure.
Source: EPSO concludes competitions under the former competition model
EPSO selection and an institution’s subsequent recruitment are separate steps.
Source: Permanent staff selection
The university-graduate administrative traineeship has its own application rounds.
Source: Virtual Blue Book: administrative traineeship for university graduates
Maintain separate reminders for application closure, documents, testing and decisions. Copy times and time zones exactly; a programme start date is not an application deadline.
| Cycle | Application dates | Likely assessment window | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent competitions | Check the individual competition notice | Follow the testing invitation | Official source The competition notice and its webpage are the essential references for the procedure. Do not transfer dates from another competition. Source: Permanent staff selection |
| Blue Book sessions | Check the current session calendar | Selection follows preselection | Official source The programme describes two application periods each year, followed by document verification and selection for specific placements. Preselection alone does not secure a traineeship. Source: Blue Book process overview |
Build a short plan around your weakest relevant skill. After each practice session, record the error, its cause and one change to try next time. Improvement should be visible in your reasoning and explanations, not simply in the number of questions completed.
Create a checklist linking every eligibility requirement to a document or example. Verify dates, qualification names and language descriptions against your submitted application. If a statement needs explanation, draft that explanation now. Keep the original document and a clearly named copy together so that later requests are easier to answer accurately.
For numerical practice, distinguish calculation errors from misreading the question or chart. For verbal questions, mark the sentence supporting your answer and notice when an option requires an assumption. For abstract problems, describe the rule in words before choosing. Repeat a difficult question untimed until you can explain the method, then work on pace.
Choose a short public policy document and write a concise briefing for a reader unfamiliar with it. State the issue, summarize the evidence and identify a decision or implication. Revise once for structure and once for unnecessary detail. Keep your own opinions separate from the document’s claims and avoid introducing unsupported facts.
When reviewing EU material, ask which institution acts, what problem the procedure addresses and how the decision moves forward. Draw a simple sequence from memory, then check it against the text. This creates an active reading exercise and reveals gaps more clearly than repeatedly highlighting entire paragraphs.
Connect the position’s work to something you have actually studied or done. Explain the contribution you could make and the capability you want to develop. Replace broad enthusiasm with an example. For a cover letter, remove sentences that could be sent unchanged to an unrelated team and use the space for relevant evidence.
Select a project involving an uncertain decision or competing priorities. Explain the context briefly, identify your responsibility, describe your action and evaluate the result. Practice a short version and a deeper discussion. Be ready to explain what you would change; thoughtful reflection is more informative than pretending the work had no limitations.
No. AD5 is a particular graduate competition route. Identify whether your opportunity concerns a permanent competition, contract post, temporary vacancy or traineeship before choosing practice.
The reviewed Blue Book guidance describes application assessment and placement selection, rather than the AD5 test sequence. Prioritize the published requirements and any instructions from your recruiting unit.
Create a core account of your interests, then make each position-specific letter concrete. Explain how your evidence fits the work instead of simply changing the team name.
No. Game Assessment Prep is independent. Use official examples to understand the announced format, and follow the rules in your invitation during any live assessment.
The sources below support this guide. Claim labels distinguish official information, candidate reports, and research inferences.
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
4,700+ candidates from MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Yale and 100+ universities have run 68,000+ practice sessions here · median +25% score improvement by the fifth attempt · 84% of 6,000+ game ratings say “Great”.

EPSO competitions, CAST contract roles and Blue Book traineeships follow separate selection routes; no shared game battery is established.
By the Game Assessment Prep research teamUpdated September 17, 2026How we research
No reviewed source establishes one game-based assessment shared by all European Commission applicants. Identify the named test in your invitation before selecting practice.
A useful preparation plan begins with the exact opportunity. Copy its reference into your notes and separate mandatory requirements from desirable experience. This prevents time being spent on an assessment that belongs to another route.
This guide distinguishes official process information from suggested exercises. The exercises help you organize practice; they are not leaked questions, predictions of your interview or an official EPSO preparation product.
EPSO competitions produce reserve lists for EU institutions. Graduate AD5 competitions require no previous professional experience; specialist competitions have different requirements.
Source: Permanent staff selection
The Commission also recruits non-permanent staff. Recruiting services use CAST to find and shortlist contract-agent profiles matching their vacancies.
Source: Apply for temporary jobs
Initial assessment considers education, language skills and other experience. Supporting documents are checked before successful applicants enter the Virtual Blue Book.
Source: Blue Book process overview
The current AD5 guidance lists reasoning, EU knowledge, digital skills and the EUFTE written assessment. Reasoning includes verbal, numerical and abstract questions. Confirm the exact conditions in your competition notice.
Source: Graduates (Administrators – AD5)
EUFTE evaluates written communication using supplied material: logical organization, concision, clarity, audience awareness and effective use of information. It is not presented as a factual-knowledge or language test.
Source: Graduates (Administrators – AD5)
EPSO describes multiple-choice verbal, numerical and abstract reasoning tests for contract-staff selection. Its sample materials support familiarity with the format.
Source: EPSO testing
EPSO announced in June 2024 that all competitions under its former assessment-centre model had concluded. Older descriptions of that model should not be treated as a current universal procedure.
Source: EPSO concludes competitions under the former competition model
EPSO selection and an institution’s subsequent recruitment are separate steps.
Source: Permanent staff selection
The university-graduate administrative traineeship has its own application rounds.
Source: Virtual Blue Book: administrative traineeship for university graduates
Maintain separate reminders for application closure, documents, testing and decisions. Copy times and time zones exactly; a programme start date is not an application deadline.
| Cycle | Application dates | Likely assessment window | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent competitions | Check the individual competition notice | Follow the testing invitation | Official source The competition notice and its webpage are the essential references for the procedure. Do not transfer dates from another competition. Source: Permanent staff selection |
| Blue Book sessions | Check the current session calendar | Selection follows preselection | Official source The programme describes two application periods each year, followed by document verification and selection for specific placements. Preselection alone does not secure a traineeship. Source: Blue Book process overview |
Build a short plan around your weakest relevant skill. After each practice session, record the error, its cause and one change to try next time. Improvement should be visible in your reasoning and explanations, not simply in the number of questions completed.
Create a checklist linking every eligibility requirement to a document or example. Verify dates, qualification names and language descriptions against your submitted application. If a statement needs explanation, draft that explanation now. Keep the original document and a clearly named copy together so that later requests are easier to answer accurately.
For numerical practice, distinguish calculation errors from misreading the question or chart. For verbal questions, mark the sentence supporting your answer and notice when an option requires an assumption. For abstract problems, describe the rule in words before choosing. Repeat a difficult question untimed until you can explain the method, then work on pace.
Choose a short public policy document and write a concise briefing for a reader unfamiliar with it. State the issue, summarize the evidence and identify a decision or implication. Revise once for structure and once for unnecessary detail. Keep your own opinions separate from the document’s claims and avoid introducing unsupported facts.
When reviewing EU material, ask which institution acts, what problem the procedure addresses and how the decision moves forward. Draw a simple sequence from memory, then check it against the text. This creates an active reading exercise and reveals gaps more clearly than repeatedly highlighting entire paragraphs.
Connect the position’s work to something you have actually studied or done. Explain the contribution you could make and the capability you want to develop. Replace broad enthusiasm with an example. For a cover letter, remove sentences that could be sent unchanged to an unrelated team and use the space for relevant evidence.
Select a project involving an uncertain decision or competing priorities. Explain the context briefly, identify your responsibility, describe your action and evaluate the result. Practice a short version and a deeper discussion. Be ready to explain what you would change; thoughtful reflection is more informative than pretending the work had no limitations.
No. AD5 is a particular graduate competition route. Identify whether your opportunity concerns a permanent competition, contract post, temporary vacancy or traineeship before choosing practice.
The reviewed Blue Book guidance describes application assessment and placement selection, rather than the AD5 test sequence. Prioritize the published requirements and any instructions from your recruiting unit.
Create a core account of your interests, then make each position-specific letter concrete. Explain how your evidence fits the work instead of simply changing the team name.
No. Game Assessment Prep is independent. Use official examples to understand the announced format, and follow the rules in your invitation during any live assessment.
The sources below support this guide. Claim labels distinguish official information, candidate reports, and research inferences.
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
European Commission · Accessed
EPSO / EU Careers · Accessed
4,700+ candidates · 68,000+ practice sessions across Game Assessment Prep.