Sova assessment study guide

Choose the modules in your invitation, learn the reasoning methods and practice making accurate decisions efficiently.

Choose a practice drill

Methods and worked examples

These short teaching examples introduce the method. Scored practice uses separate questions and more demanding combinations.

Numerical reasoning

Numerical data

Check the source labels, units and period before calculating. Locate the values needed for the question and keep them separate from related but irrelevant figures. If several answers are required, verify each one independently.

Watch for: Comparing percentages without checking their denominators, or assuming only one option can be correct.

Practice numerical data

Example

Orders rise from 120 to 150 in the East and from 80 to 90 in the West. Which two claims are supported: East rose 25%; total orders rose 20%; West rose 25%; East supplied two thirds of the new total?

Solution: East rose 25%, and total orders rose 20%. East’s increase is 30 ÷ 120 = 25%. The total rises from 200 to 240, an increase of 40 ÷ 200 = 20%. West rises 12.5%, and East supplies 150 ÷ 240 = 62.5% of the new total.

Numerical calculations

Write down the required quantity and its unit. Use a short equation to connect the facts, estimate the result, then calculate. Keep full precision until the final step.

Watch for: Applying a second percentage change to the original amount instead of the updated amount.

Practice numerical calculations

Example

A service costs £80. Its price rises by 15%, then falls by 10%. What is the final price?

Solution: £82.80. First calculate £80 × 1.15 = £92, then £92 × 0.90 = £82.80. Subtracting 10 from 15 and applying a 5% rise would incorrectly give £84.

Verbal reasoning

Verbal inference

Separate a statement that must follow from one that merely sounds plausible. Keep qualifiers such as some, most and only intact. Use the passage rather than what you know about the real world.

Watch for: Turning an association into a proven cause, or treating a sample as the whole population.

Practice verbal inference

Example

A report says: “Teams that requested the new planning tool completed more projects on average. The study did not randomly assign teams to use the tool.” Can you conclude that the tool caused the difference?

Solution: No. The teams may have differed before adopting the tool. The passage reports an association, but does not establish that the tool caused the higher output.

Verbal evidence

Find the sentence that would support or contradict a claim. If the passage does neither, keep that uncertainty instead of forcing a yes or no. Check every part of a compound claim.

Watch for: Treating “not stated” as false, or overlooking an exception in a later sentence.

Practice verbal evidence

Example

The policy says: “All permanent staff may apply for remote work. Applications require manager approval.” Is the claim “Every permanent employee works remotely” established?

Solution: Cannot say from this passage. Permission to apply is not approval, and approval would not mean every employee uses it. The passage does not say how many employees work remotely, so the claim is neither established nor contradicted.

Logical reasoning

Logical sequences

Track one feature at a time. Note what changes and what stays fixed, then test the proposed rule against every step. When two features change together, solve their rules separately before combining them.

Watch for: Choosing a rule that explains the last transition but fails earlier in the sequence.

Practice logical sequences

Example

An arrow points up, right, down and left in consecutive frames. Its shading alternates outline, filled, outline, filled. What follows?

Solution: An outline arrow pointing up. Direction rotates clockwise by 90 degrees each step, while the shading alternates independently.

Logical matrices

Compare corresponding features across a row, then check the same relationship in another row or column. Counts, positions and shading can follow different rules. Use all available cells to eliminate competing explanations.

Watch for: Adding an unsupported rule to explain only the row containing the missing cell.

Practice logical matrices

Example

In a grid, every row contains a circle, square and triangle once each. The last row already contains a triangle and a circle. What shape is missing?

Solution: A square. The stated rule fixes shape only; it does not tell you the fill, rotation or position of a smaller symbol. Use additional evidence before choosing between options that differ on those features.

Situational judgment

Situational judgment

Identify the immediate problem, who is affected and what authority you have. Prefer a proportionate action that checks important facts, addresses the issue and communicates with the right people. Evaluate both the strongest and weakest response.

Watch for: Choosing an impressive-sounding action that ignores the stated problem or exceeds your role.

Practice situational judgment

Example

You confirm that a report contains a material error shortly before it is sent to a client. The responsible lead is available. Options are: alert the lead with the source evidence and propose a correction; knowingly send the inaccurate report without mentioning the error; ask a colleague to check the figures but do not notify the lead yet; or ask the lead to delay sending without explaining what is wrong.

Solution: For this teaching scenario, alerting the lead with the evidence and a proposed correction is the most effective response. Knowingly sending the inaccurate report without mentioning the error is the least effective: it exposes the client to information you know is materially wrong. The other responses offer some protection but communicate incompletely. These are reasoned editorial judgments, not an employer’s answer key.

Practice selecting more than one answer

Read the selection count before answering. In this question, two claims must be supported; finding one is not enough.

Which two statements are supported?

Select two answers using the order data.

Orders received
RegionEarlierLater
East120150
West8090
Choose two statements
0 of 2 selected

What the practice tests cover

Sova is an assessment platform with different activities. Your employer chooses the combination. Start with the module names in your invitation and check the official candidate preparation hub.

Our original practice formats
PracticeContentFeedback
Short drills6 questions in one topicAfter you check each answer
Mixed reasoning practice36 questions: 12 numerical, 12 verbal, 12 logicalAt the end
Numerical, verbal or logical test12 questions in the selected subjectAt the end
Situational judgment test12 workplace scenarios with most/least selectionsAt the end

These counts and topic mixes are our practice design. They are not a universal Sova blueprint. Our forms are fixed before you begin; they do not reproduce Sova’s adaptive selection or private scoring model.

Some practice questions have one correct answer; others explicitly require two or three. Situational-judgment questions require distinct most-effective and least-effective choices. Confirm your complete selection before moving on; submitted answers lock.

Is this every Sova assessment?

No. The Sova catalog also includes checking, learnability, specialist skills and other activities. Numerical and verbal products include different levels; our Standard and Challenge labels are practice difficulty labels, not official level equivalents. The Early Careers product combines image-based personality and situational judgment with optional numerical, logical and learnability modules. It is different from a generic numerical/verbal/logical battery. Our pass covers the reasoning and judgment practice listed above; other modules are not simulated.

Accuracy and pace both matter

There is no hard countdown in our Sova practice. That does not mean speed is irrelevant. Sova’s reasoning guidance says its numerical, verbal and logical assessments have no fixed time limit, while response time contributes to performance.

Our results show accuracy and response time separately. Review slow correct answers as well as mistakes: an efficient method matters more than rushing the same method. For judgment scenarios, your score measures agreement with our explained editorial choices.

Your practice score is not an official percentile, a personality-fit score or a hiring prediction. Employers can use different comparisons and criteria. A stronger practice result helps identify learning progress, but it does not establish an employer’s pass mark.

Prepare for the employer’s actual modules

Bain London Associate Consultant

Bain’s 2026 London hiring page names Sova numerical reasoning, logical reasoning and personality. Prioritize the numerical and logical drills and tests here, then read the unscored personality orientation below. That page does not list verbal reasoning or situational judgment for this intake.

For other offices or roles, check the invitation first. Bain’s digital-assessment guidance says the provider can be Sova or TestGorilla. Its approximate completion time is not a universal countdown.

Other employers can use different tasks

Sky Home Service describes Sova workplace responses and working-style questions, followed by video questions for candidates who progress. That route calls for different preparation from Bain London’s reasoning combination.

For JCB, Sova’s early-careers case study confirms a tailored assessment process but does not publish every scheme’s exact module list. Use your own invitation to choose what to practice.

Personality and motivation: understand yourself

These activities ask about your typical preferences and behavior, rather than a calculation with a correct answer. Answer honestly for how you usually act. Do not try to build an imagined ideal candidate from a collection of supposedly desirable traits.

  • Read the response instruction carefully. A rating scale, ranking task and choice between statements require different actions.
  • Use a consistent real context, such as your usual behavior at work or in study. Think about a recent example when a statement feels abstract.
  • Notice qualifiers such as usually, often and strongly. Choose the response that fits your actual pattern.
  • For motivation, reflect on what sustains your effort: learning, autonomy, collaboration, structure or other genuine priorities. No single preference is universally best.

Three reflection prompts

  1. Recall a project you enjoyed. Which parts gave you energy, and which drained it?
  2. Think of a time a plan changed unexpectedly. What did you actually do first?
  3. Compare independent work with group work. What helps you do each well, and where do you need support?

These are unscored reflection prompts. There is no answer key and nothing to submit.

Sova’s candidate hub explains the different activities. Bain’s London guidance also says it is not looking for one personality type. If your invitation uses image-based choices, read how to select responses rather than guessing what an image supposedly signals.

Prepare real examples for video questions

If your invitation includes a recorded interview, choose real examples of teamwork, handling a mistake, learning something difficult and adapting to change. State the situation briefly, explain your own action and finish with the outcome and what you learned.

  • Answer the question asked; do not recite a script that only loosely fits.
  • Practice speaking clearly within the preparation and response limits shown in your invitation.
  • Check your microphone, camera, lighting and connection before the actual assessment.
Explore video interview practice

Video interview practice is a separate product and is not included in the Sova pass. Our reasoning and judgment tests do not reproduce employer video questions.

Build a repeatable preparation routine

  1. Match your invitation. Select the reasoning subjects and other activities you actually need. Check the official examples before starting.
  2. Start with a short drill. Focus on the method and explain each answer in your own words. Identify whether a mistake came from reading, reasoning or calculation.
  3. Try fresh questions. A remembered answer is useful rehearsal but does not measure new reasoning. Practice selection prefers unseen material while it is available.
  4. Take a longer test. Work steadily without checking explanations in the middle. Review accuracy and pace together at the end.
  5. Target the next weakness. Revisit a slow or inaccurate topic, then compare another attempt of the same kind. Progress is more convincing when it repeats across different forms.

Our demanding practice goal is at least 90% correct overall, in each subject and on the harder Challenge questions, with every question answered. Fractional targets round up: a six-question drill requires six correct answers. Judgment practice counts a scenario as matched only when both your most-effective and least-effective choices agree with the explained practice key.

These are editorial learning goals, not official Sova cutoffs. Pace is reported separately; there is no invented employer time threshold. Aim for consistent results on different sets, rather than counting familiar questions as new evidence.

Use a calculator, pen and paper for our numerical practice. The official Sova candidate hub recommends these tools; your employer’s instructions take priority. Arrange any needed assessment adjustments with the employer before starting the real assessment.

Choose your next practice

Pick a six-question drill to focus on one method, or a longer test to practice working through a complete set. One Sova pass covers all longer tests and drill replays.

Original independent preparation. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Sova or the employers named. Source guidance checked September 2026; follow the current instructions in your invitation.